The peer review process by AMECJ
This journal operates a double -blind review process. All contributions will be initially assessed by the editor for suitability for the journal. Papers deemed suitable are then typically sent to a minimum of three independent expert reviewers to assess the scientific quality of the paper. The Editor is responsible for the final decision regarding acceptance or rejection of articles. AMEC Journal checks all similarity of text manuscript with other published papers by iThenticate tools as a plagiarism detection tool (Cross Check). I run all revised papers through the program and report to our editorial team at the “decision-making” meetings, where we compose each issue. So, manuscript with more than15% similarity returns to authors without peer review process. Any previous references of authors introduce in manuscript must be hide for reviewers. To avoid unnecessary errors you are strongly advised to use the 'spell-check' and 'grammar-check' functions of your word processor before submitting to journal (Figure1).
Types of peer review by AMECJ
Double-blind review was used as types of peer review by AMECJ. Both the reviewer and the author are unknown. The double-blind review has many advantages as below.
- Author unknown limits reviewers (gender, country, academic status or university, previous publication).
- The renowned authors deepened on their articles and must be considered carefully by double-blind review process.